Adjusted Funds From Operations — the gold standard cash flow metric for REITs.
Real-estate accounting has a structural quirk: GAAP depreciation makes a profitable apartment tower look like a money-losing business on the income statement. That's why every REIT analyst — and the dividend investors who follow them — anchors on AFFO instead of net income. AFFO answers the question that actually matters: after the buildings have been kept standing and the leases re-signed, how much cash is left for the dividend?
Buildings depreciate on the income statement on a 27.5-to-39-year schedule. In reality, well-maintained commercial real estate often appreciates. FFO (Funds From Operations), defined by NAREIT in 1991, fixes the most obvious distortion by adding depreciation back. But FFO still overstates distributable cash because every REIT has ongoing maintenance obligations: HVAC swaps, parking lots, roof membranes, common-area refreshes, and the tenant improvements and leasing commissions paid whenever space is re-leased. AFFO subtracts those recurring costs.
Net Income
+ Depreciation & Amortization (real estate)
− Gains on Property Sales (non-recurring)
= FFO (NAREIT definition)
− Recurring Maintenance CapEx
− Straight-Line Rent Adjustment
− Tenant Improvements (TI) for re-leasing
− Leasing Commissions
= AFFO
The single most important REIT-quality signal: Dividends per share ÷ AFFO per share. Three zones:
| Sector | Typical P/AFFO | Typical payout |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial / logistics | 22-28x | 65-75% |
| Data centers | 22-32x | 60-70% |
| Self-storage | 18-25x | 65-80% |
| Apartments | 17-22x | 70-85% |
| Net-lease retail | 15-20x | 80-90% |
| Office | 8-13x | 75-95% |
| Mortgage REITs (book-value) | N/A | 85-100% |
1. Headline FFO without AFFO. Many REITs prefer FFO in press releases because it's higher. Always re-do the AFFO math from the supplemental package — recurring CapEx assumptions are where management discretion lives.
2. Treating gains on sales as "AFFO." One-time disposition gains should be stripped out; they aren't repeatable. A REIT funding its dividend with asset sales is liquidating, not earning.
3. Ignoring lease-up CapEx during downturns. Office REITs in 2024-25 saw TI packages and free rent balloon as concessions to backfill vacant space. Those costs are recurring; they belong in AFFO.
Cash Available for Distribution (CAD) and Funds Available for Distribution (FAD) are essentially synonyms for AFFO — different REITs picked different names in the 1990s. NAREIT now informally treats them interchangeably.
For valuation multiples, consensus forward AFFO is more common because the income stream is forward-looking. For dividend safety, use trailing twelve-month AFFO — you want proof, not projection.
Yes — it's already inside net income, so it flows through the ladder. AFFO is after corporate overhead.
GAAP averages contractual rent escalators across the lease term, recognizing more revenue early than is actually collected. The SLR adjustment removes that non-cash revenue so AFFO reflects real cash inflows.
Theoretically yes (negative adjustments), but extremely rare. Almost always AFFO < FFO because real CapEx and re-leasing costs are positive.
REITs must distribute 90% of taxable income to keep REIT status — but taxable income is much lower than AFFO because depreciation is fully deductible. So the 90% rule is rarely the binding constraint; AFFO payout discipline is.
Educational only; not investment advice. Reviewed by Tobias Lindqvist on March 1, 2026.